Validating secure assembly and delivery of multiple information handling systems installed in a shared chassis

ABSTRACT

Embodiments validate the secure assembly and delivery of IHSs (Information Handling Systems) that are installed in a shared chassis, such as two 1RU (rack unit) servers installed in a shared 2RU chassis. An inventory certificate is retrieved that was uploaded to a first IHS of the IHSs installed in the shared chassis during factory provisioning of the first IHS. The inventory certificate specifies factory installed hardware components installed in each of the IHSs of the shared chassis. A validation process of the first IHS collects an inventory of hardware components detected by each of the IHSs of the shared chassis. The validation process compares the collected inventory of detected hardware components of the IHSs against the factory installed hardware components specified in the inventory certificate in order to validate the detected hardware components as the same hardware components installed during factory assembly of each of the IHSs.

FIELD

The present disclosure relates generally to Information Handling Systems (IHSs), and relates more particularly to IHS security.

BACKGROUND

As the value and use of information continues to increase, individuals and businesses seek additional ways to process and store information. One option available to users is Information Handling Systems (IHSs). An IHS generally processes, compiles, stores, and/or communicates information or data for business, personal, or other purposes thereby allowing users to take advantage of the value of the information. Because technology and information handling needs and requirements vary between different users or applications, IHSs may also vary regarding what information is handled, how the information is handled, how much information is processed, stored, or communicated, and how quickly and efficiently the information may be processed, stored, or communicated. The variations in IHSs allow for IHSs to be general or configured for a specific user or specific use such as financial transaction processing, airline reservations, enterprise data storage, or global communications. In addition, IHSs may include a variety of hardware and software components that may be configured to process, store, and communicate information and may include one or more computer systems, data storage systems, and networking systems.

Some types of IHSs, such as rack-mounted servers, are frequently manufactured and customized according to specifications provided by a specific customer that has contracted for the manufacture and delivery of the server. In such instances, a customer may specify various hardware and/or software customizations that configure the server to support specific functionality. For example, a customer may contract for manufacture and delivery of a server that includes security adaptations that will enable the server to securely process high volumes of financial transactions. However, such security adaptations may be circumvented by malicious actors by surreptitiously replacing factory installed hardware components of an IHS with compromised hardware components. Each time a hardware component of an IHS is replaced or a new hardware component is installed to an IHS, an opportunity is presented for a malicious actor to substitute a compromised hardware component for a genuine hardware component. In some instances, multiple IHSs may be installed a single chassis. In such instances, the IHSs may share various resources that are supported by hardware components of the chassis. Accordingly, any shared hardware components supported a chassis present a malicious actor with an opportunity to compromise all of the IHSs installed in the chassis.

SUMMARY

Various embodiments provide methods for validating secure assembly and delivery of two or more IHSs (Information Handling Systems) installed in a shared chassis. The methods may include: retrieving an inventory certificate uploaded to a first IHS of the IHSs installed in the shared chassis during factory provisioning of the first IHS, wherein the inventory certificate specifies an inventory of factory installed hardware components installed in each of the IHSs installed in the shared chassis; collecting, by a validation process of the first IHS, an inventory of hardware components detected by each of the IHSs installed in the shared chassis; and comparing, by the validation process of the first IHS, the collected inventory of detected hardware components of the IHSs against the factory installed hardware components specified in the inventory certificate in order to validate the detected hardware components as the same hardware components installed during factory assembly of each of the IHSs.

In additional method embodiments, the inventory certificate further specifies hardware components of the chassis that are shared by the IHSs installed in the chassis. In additional method embodiments, the shared hardware components comprise persistent storage accessible by each of the IHSs installed in the shared chassis. In additional method embodiments, the inventory of factory installed hardware components included in the inventory certificate is signed using a keypair that is generated by the first IHS during the factory provisioning of the first IHS. In additional method embodiments, the keypair is shared with each of the IHSs installed in the shared chassis during factory provisioning of each of the IHSs. In additional method embodiments, the keypair is shared via a shared hardware component that is accessible by each of the IHSs installed in the shared chassis. In additional embodiments, methods may further include validating, by the validation process of the first IHS, an integrity of the signed inventory of factory installed hardware components included in the inventory certificate using the shared keypair. In additional method embodiments, the inventory certificate is uploaded during factory provisioning of the first IHS by a chassis management controller of the first IHS storing the inventory certificate to a persistent memory of the first IHS.

Various additional embodiments provide methods for validating secure assembly and delivery of a first IHS that utilizes hardware components of a shared chassis. The methods may include: retrieving an IHS inventory certificate uploaded to the first IHS during factory provisioning of the first IHS, wherein the IHS inventory certificate includes an inventory identifying a plurality of hardware components of the first IHS installed during factory assembly of the first IHS; retrieving a chassis inventory certificate uploaded to the first IHS during factory provisioning of the first IHS, wherein the chassis inventory certificate includes an inventory identifying a plurality of shared hardware components of the chassis; collecting an inventory of detected hardware components of the first IHS and an inventory of detected hardware components of the chassis; and comparing the collected inventories of detected hardware components of the first IHS and of the chassis against the inventories from the IHS inventory certificate and from the chassis inventory certificate in order to validate the detected hardware components as the same hardware components installed during factory assembly of the first IHS and of the chassis.

In additional method embodiments, the shared hardware components comprise storage drives accessible by the first IHS and by additional IHSs installed in the shared chassis. In additional method embodiments, the inventory of factory installed hardware components included in the IHS inventory certificate is signed using a private keypair that is generated by the first IHS during the factory provisioning of the first IHS. In additional method embodiments, the inventory of shared hardware components of the chassis included in the chassis inventory certificate is signed using a shared keypair that is generated by the first IHS during the factory provisioning of the first IHS. In additional method embodiments, the shared keypair is shared with each of the IHSs installed in the shared chassis during factory provisioning of each of the IHSs. In additional method embodiments, the keypair is shared via a shared hardware component that is accessible by each of the IHSs installed in the shared chassis. In additional embodiments, methods may further include validating an integrity of the signed inventory of factory installed hardware components included in the IHS inventory certificate using the private keypair. In additional embodiments, methods may further include validating an integrity of the signed inventory of shared hardware components of the chassis included in the chassis inventory certificate using the shared keypair.

Various additional embodiments provide a first IHS of a plurality of IHSs installed in a shared chassis. The first IHS includes: a plurality of hardware components, wherein during factory provisioning of the first IHS an inventory certificate is uploaded to the IHS, wherein the inventory certificate specifies an inventory of factory installed hardware components installed in each of the plurality of IHSs installed in the shared chassis, and wherein the plurality of hardware components comprise: one or more processors; and one or more memory devices coupled to the processors, the memory devices storing computer-readable instructions that, upon execution by the processors, cause a validation process of the first IHS to: retrieve the inventory certificate uploaded to the first IHS during factory provisioning of the first IHS; collect an inventory of hardware components detected by each of plurality of the IHSs installed in the shared chassis, wherein the hardware components detected by the first IHS comprise the plurality of hardware components; and compare the collected inventory of detected hardware components of the plurality IHSs against the factory installed hardware components specified in the inventory certificate in order to validate the detected hardware components as the same hardware components installed during factory assembly of each of the IHSs.

In additional IHS embodiments, the inventory certificate further specifies hardware components of the chassis that are shared by the plurality of IHSs installed in the chassis. In additional IHS embodiments, the inventory of factory installed hardware components included in the inventory certificate is signed using a keypair that is generated by the first IHS during the factory provisioning of the first IHS. In additional IHS embodiments, the keypair is shared with each of the IHSs installed in the shared chassis during factory provisioning of each of the IHSs.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention(s) is/are illustrated by way of example and is/are not limited by the accompanying figures. Elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity, and have not necessarily been drawn to scale.

FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating certain components of a chassis, according to some embodiments, for supporting validation of the secure assembly and delivery of multiple IHSs installed in the chassis.

FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating certain components of an IHS configured as a component of a chassis, according to some embodiments, for supporting validation of the secure assembly and delivery of multiple IHSs installed in a shared chassis.

FIG. 3 is a swim lane diagram illustrating certain responsibilities of components of a system configured according to certain embodiments for factory provisioning of an IHS in a manner that supports validation of the secure assembly and delivery of multiple IHSs installed in a shared chassis.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart describing certain steps of a method, according to some embodiments, for assembly and provisioning of an IHS in a manner that supports validation of the secure assembly and delivery of multiple IHSs installed in a shared chassis.

FIG. 5 is a swim lane diagram illustrating certain responsibilities of components of an IHS configured according to certain embodiments for validation of the secure assembly and delivery of multiple IHSs installed in a shared chassis.

FIG. 6 is a flowchart describing certain steps of an additional method, according to some embodiments, for supporting validation of the secure assembly and delivery of multiple IHSs installed in a shared chassis.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating certain components of a chassis 100 comprising one or more compute sleds 105 a-n and one or more storage sleds 115 a-n that may be configured to implement the systems and methods described herein for supporting validation of the secure assembly and delivery of multiple IHSs installed in the chassis 100. Embodiments of chassis 100 may include a wide variety of different hardware configurations. Such variations in hardware configuration may result from chassis 100 being factory assembled to include components specified by a customer that has contracted for manufacture and delivery of chassis 100. Upon delivery and deployment of an IHS, an IHS may be modified by replacing various hardware components of the IHS, or by installing new hardware components to the IHS. As described in additional detail below, embodiments of chassis 100 may include capabilities that allow a user to validate that the detected hardware components of multiple IHSs installed in chassis 100 are factory installed hardware components of these IHSs. In some embodiments, the hardware components of multiple IHSs installed in a shared chassis 100 may be collectively validated as being factory installed hardware components, thus supporting validation of computing solutions that span multiple IHSs. In some embodiments, the detected hardware components of an IHS installed in a shared chassis 100 may be validated along with any shared hardware components of the chassis 100 as being factory installed hardware components.

Chassis 100 may include one or more bays that each receive an individual sled (that may be additionally or alternatively referred to as a tray, blade, and/or node), such as compute sleds 105 a-n and storage sleds 115 a-n. Chassis 100 may support a variety of different numbers (e.g., 4, 8, 16, 32), sizes (e.g., single-width, double-width) and physical configurations of bays. Other embodiments may include additional types of sleds that provide various types of storage and/or processing capabilities. Other types of sleds may provide power management and networking functions. Sleds may be individually installed and removed from the chassis 100, thus allowing the computing and storage capabilities of a chassis to be reconfigured by swapping the sleds with different types of sleds, in many cases without affecting the operations of the other sleds installed in the chassis 100.

Multiple chassis 100 may be housed within a rack. Data centers may utilize large numbers of racks, with various different types of chassis installed in the various configurations of racks. The modular architecture provided by the sleds, chassis and rack allow for certain resources, such as cooling, power and network bandwidth, to be shared by the compute sleds 105 a-n and storage sleds 115 a-n, thus providing efficiency improvements and supporting greater computational loads.

Chassis 100 may be installed within a rack structure that provides all or part of the cooling utilized by chassis 100. For airflow cooling, a rack may include one or more banks of cooling fans that may be operated to ventilate heated air from within the chassis 100 that is housed within the rack. The chassis 100 may alternatively or additionally include one or more cooling fans 130 that may be similarly operated to ventilate heated air from within the sleds 105 a-n, 115 a-n installed within the chassis. A rack and a chassis 100 installed within the rack may utilize various configurations and combinations of cooling fans to cool the sleds 105 a-n, 115 a-n and other components housed within chassis 100.

The sleds 105 a-n, 115 a-n may be individually coupled to chassis 100 via connectors that correspond to the bays provided by the chassis 100 and that physically and electrically couple an individual sled to a backplane 160. Chassis backplane 160 may be a printed circuit board that includes electrical traces and connectors that are configured to route signals between the various components of chassis 100 that are connected to the backplane 160. In various embodiments, backplane 160 may include various additional components, such as cables, wires, midplanes, backplanes, connectors, expansion slots, and multiplexers. In certain embodiments, backplane 160 may be a motherboard that includes various electronic components installed thereon. Such components installed on a motherboard backplane 160 may include components that implement all or part of the functions described with regard to the SAS (Serial Attached SCSI) expander 150, I/O controllers 145, network controller 140 and power supply unit 135. In some embodiments, a backplane 160 may be uniquely identified based on a code or other identifier that may be permanently encoded in a non-volatile memory of the backplane 160 by its manufacturer. As described below, embodiments may support validation of backplane 160 as being the same backplane that was installed at the factory during the manufacture of chassis 100.

In certain embodiments, a compute sled 105 a-n may be an IHS such as described with regard to IHS 200 of FIG. 2. A compute sled 105 a-n may provide computational processing resources that may be used to support a variety of e-commerce, multimedia, business and scientific computing applications, such as services provided via a cloud implementation. Compute sleds 105 a-n are typically configured with hardware and software that provide leading-edge computational capabilities. Accordingly, services provided using such computing capabilities are typically provided as high-availability systems that operate with minimum downtime. As described in additional detail with regard to FIG. 2, compute sleds 105 a-n may be configured for general-purpose computing or may be optimized for specific computing tasks.

As illustrated, each compute sled 105 a-n includes a remote access controller (RAC) 110 a-n. As described in additional detail with regard to FIG. 2, remote access controller 110 a-n provides capabilities for remote monitoring and management of compute sled 105 a-n. In support of these monitoring and management functions, remote access controllers 110 a-n may utilize both in-band and sideband (i.e., out-of-band) communications with various components of a compute sled 105 a-n and chassis 100. Remote access controllers 110 a-n may collect various types of sensor data, such as collecting temperature sensor readings that are used in support of airflow cooling of the chassis 100 and the sleds 105 a-n, 115 a-n. In addition, each remote access controller 110 a-n may implement various monitoring and administrative functions related to compute sleds 105 a-n that utilize sideband bus connections with various internal components of the respective compute sleds 105 a-n.

In some embodiments, each compute sled 105 a-n installed in chassis 100 may be uniquely identified based on a code or other identifier that may be permanently encoded in a non-volatile memory of a respective compute sled 105 a-n by its manufacturer. As described below, embodiments support validation of each compute sled 105 a-n as being a compute sled that was installed at the factory during the manufacture of chassis 100. Also as described below, during a provisioning phase of the factory assembly of an IHS, such as a compute sled 105 a-n, that is installed in chassis 100, a signed certificate that specifies hardware components of the compute sleds 105 a-n that were factory installed may be stored in a non-volatile memory that is accessed by a remote access controller 110 a-n of a compute sled 105 a-n. Accordingly, each compute sled 105 a-n installed in chassis 100 may be factory provisioned with a separate inventory certificate that specifies the factory installed hardware of the respective compute sled. In some instances, the inventory certificates for multiple compute sleds 105 a-n installed in a single chassis 100 may be collected into a single solution inventory certificate that may be shared among the compute sleds 105 a-n and provides the capability for validating the hardware of a computing solution that is implemented using multiple compute sleds. In certain instances, each of the compute sleds 105 a-n may share resources that are provided using shared hardware components of the chassis 100, such as storage resources provided by a set of storage sleds 115 a-n installed in bays of the chassis 100. In such instances, embodiments may also support the use of a chassis inventory certificate that may be shared by the compute sleds 105 a-n installed in the chassis 100, where the chassis inventory certificate may be used by each of the compute sleds 105 a-n to validate that the shared hardware components of chassis 100 are the same components that were installed at the factory during its manufacture. In embodiments utilizing a shared solution inventory certificate for a multi-IHS computing solution, the chassis inventory certificate may be included in a solution inventory certificate along with inventory certificates corresponding to each of the compute sleds 105 a-n installed in the chassis 100.

Each of the compute sleds 105 a-n may include a storage controller 135 a-n that may be utilized to access storage drives that are accessible via chassis 100. Some of the individual storage controllers 135 a-n may provide support for RAID (Redundant Array of Independent Disks) configurations of logical and physical storage drives, such as storage drives provided by storage sleds 115 a-n. In some embodiments, some or all of the individual storage controllers 135 a-n may be HBAs (Host Bus Adapters) that provide more limited capabilities in accessing physical storage drives provided via storage sleds 115 a-n and/or via SAS expander 150.

In addition to the data storage capabilities provided by storage sleds 115 a-n, chassis 100 may provide access to other storage resources that may be installed components of chassis 100 and/or may be installed elsewhere within a rack housing the chassis 100, such as within a storage blade. In certain scenarios, such storage resources 155 may be accessed via a SAS expander 150 that is coupled to the backplane 160 of the chassis 100. The SAS expander 150 may support connections to a number of JBOD (Just a Bunch Of Disks) storage drives 155 that may be configured and managed individually and without implementing data redundancy across the various drives 155. The additional storage resources 155 may also be at various other locations within a datacenter in which chassis 100 is installed. Such additional storage resources 155 may also be remotely located. In some embodiments, a SAS expander 150 and storage drives 155 may each be uniquely identified based on a code or other identifier that may be permanently encoded in a non-volatile memory of the SAS expander or storage drive by its respective manufacturer. In instances where SAS expander 150 and storage drives 155 are factory installed, as described below, embodiments may support the ability for each compute sled 105 a-n to validate SAS expander 150 and storage drives 155 as being the same SAS expander and storage drives that were installed at the factory during the manufacture of chassis 100.

As illustrated, chassis 100 also includes one or more storage sleds 115 a-n that are coupled to the backplane 160 and installed within one or more bays of chassis 200 in a similar manner to compute sleds 105 a-n. Each of the individual storage sleds 115 a-n may include various different numbers and types of storage devices. For instance, storage sleds 115 a-n may include SAS (Serial Attached SCSI) magnetic disk drives, SATA (Serial Advanced Technology Attachment) magnetic disk drives, solid-state drives (SSDs) and other types of storage drives in various combinations. The storage sleds 115 a-n may be utilized in various storage configurations by the compute sleds 105 a-n that are coupled to chassis 100. As illustrated, each storage sled 115 a-n includes a remote access controller (RAC) 120 a-n provides capabilities for remote monitoring and management of respective storage sleds 115 a-n. In some embodiments, each storage sled 115 a-n may be uniquely identified based on a code or other identifier that may be permanently encoded in a non-volatile memory of the respective storage sled 115 a-n by its manufacturer. As described below, embodiments support the ability for each compute sled 105 a-n to validate each storage sled 115 a-n as being a storage sled that was installed at the factory during the manufacture of chassis 100.

As illustrated, the chassis 100 of FIG. 1 includes a network controller 140 that provides network access to the sleds 105 a-n, 115 a-n installed within the chassis. Network controller 140 may include various switches, adapters, controllers and couplings used to connect chassis 100 to a network, either directly or via additional networking components and connections provided via a rack in which chassis 100 is installed. In some embodiments, a network controller 140 may be uniquely identified based on a code or other identifier that may be permanently encoded in a non-volatile memory of the network controller 140 by its manufacturer. As described below, embodiments support the ability for each compute sled 105 a-n to validate network controller 140 as being the same network controller that was installed at the factory during the manufacture of chassis 100.

Chassis 100 may similarly include a power supply unit 135 that provides the components of the chassis with various levels of DC power from an AC power source or from power delivered via a power system provided by a rack within which chassis 100 may be installed. In certain embodiments, power supply unit 135 may be implemented within a sled that may provide chassis 100 with redundant, hot-swappable power supply units. In some embodiments, a power supply unit 135 may be uniquely identified based on a code or other identifier that may be permanently encoded in a non-volatile memory of the power supply unit 135 by its manufacturer. As described below, embodiments support the ability for each compute sled 105 a-n to validate power supply unit 135 as being the same power supply unit that was installed at the factory during the manufacture of chassis 100.

Chassis 100 may also include various I/O controllers 140 that may support various I/O ports, such as USB ports that may be used to support keyboard and mouse inputs and/or video display capabilities. Such I/O controllers 145 may be utilized by the chassis management controller 125 to support various KVM (Keyboard, Video and Mouse) 125 a capabilities that provide administrators with the ability to interface with the chassis 100. In some embodiments, each I/O controller 140 may be uniquely identified based on a code or other identifier that may be permanently encoded in a non-volatile memory of the respective I/O controller 140 by its manufacturer. As described below, embodiments support the ability for each compute sled 105 a-n to validate I/O controllers 140 as being the same I/O controllers that were installed at the factory during the manufacture of chassis 100.

A chassis management controller 125 may also include a storage module 125 c that provides capabilities for managing and configuring certain aspects of the storage devices of chassis 100, such as the storage devices provided within storage sleds 115 a-n and within the JBOD 155. In some embodiments, a chassis management controller 125 may be uniquely identified based on a code or other identifier that may be permanently encoded in a non-volatile memory of the chassis management controller 125 by its manufacturer. As described below, embodiments support the ability for each compute sled 105 a-n to validate chassis management controller 125 as being the same chassis management controller that was installed at the factory during the manufacture of chassis 100.

In addition to providing support for KVM 125 a capabilities for administering chassis 100, chassis management controller 125 may support various additional functions for sharing the infrastructure resources of chassis 100. In some scenarios, chassis management controller 125 may implement tools for managing the power 135, network bandwidth 140 and airflow cooling 130 that are available via the chassis 100. As described, the airflow cooling 130 utilized by chassis 100 may include an airflow cooling system that is provided by a rack in which the chassis 100 may be installed and managed by a cooling module 125 b of the chassis management controller 125.

In some embodiments, the chassis management controller 125 may be utilized in the validation of the shared hardware components of chassis 100, the validation of the hardware components of the individual compute sleds 105 a-n installed in chassis 100 and/or in the validation of the hardware components used in computing solutions that span multiple compute sleds 105 a-n installed in chassis 100. For instance, in some embodiments, chassis management controller 125 may be utilized in the transfer of shared keypairs between the compute sleds 105 a-n. As described in further detail below, during factory provisioning of chassis 100 and of compute sleds 105 a-n, a keypair generated by one of the compute sleds 105 a-n may be shared with the other compute sleds. In some embodiments, a keypair may be shared by a compute sleds 105 a-n by storing the keypair in a secured memory of the chassis management controller 125, such as in a replay protected memory block (RPMB). Keypairs shared in this manner may be keypairs associated with a chassis inventory certificate that specifies an inventory of the shared hardware components of chassis 100 or may be associated with a solution inventory certificate that specifies an inventory of hardware components utilized by a computing solution that spans some or all of the compute sleds 105 a-n, and may also include shared hardware components of chassis 100.

In some embodiments, chassis management controller 125 may be further utilized in the validation of the hardware components used in computing solutions that span multiple compute sleds 105 a-n by supporting the collection and transfer of detected hardware inventories between the compute sleds 105 a-n. For instance, a first of the compute sleds 105 a-n may utilize a solution inventory certificate in order to validate the hardware utilized in a computing solution that spans all of the compute sleds 105 a-n. During factory provisioning of each of the compute sleds 105 a-n, the factory installed hardware of each of the compute sleds 105 a-n may be included within a solution inventory certificate that is associated with a computing solution. Any one of the compute sleds 105 a-n may utilize a shared keypair associated with the solution inventory certificate in order to validate the hardware inventory of the computing solution. In order to validate the hardware of such a computing solution, a compute sled collects an inventory of its own hardware and may rely on chassis management controller 125 to issue requests to the remote access controllers of the other compute sleds 105 a-n installed in the chassis 100 for an inventory of hardware components detected by each of these compute sleds. In some instances, the chassis management controller 125 may also provide an inventory of detected shared hardware components of chassis 100. The first of the compute sleds 105 a-n receives this inventory information collected by the chassis management controller 125 and may compare the collected inventories against the inventories included in the solution inventory certificate in order to validate that all of the compute sleds 105 a-n that implement the computing salutation are utilizing only factory installed hardware components.

For purposes of this disclosure, an IHS may include any instrumentality or aggregate of instrumentalities operable to compute, calculate, determine, classify, process, transmit, receive, retrieve, originate, switch, store, display, communicate, manifest, detect, record, reproduce, handle, or utilize any form of information, intelligence, or data for business, scientific, control, or other purposes. For example, an IHS may be a personal computer (e.g., desktop or laptop), tablet computer, mobile device (e.g., Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) or smart phone), server (e.g., blade server or rack server), a network storage device, or any other suitable device and may vary in size, shape, performance, functionality, and price. An IHS may include Random Access Memory (RAM), one or more processing resources such as a Central Processing Unit (CPU) or hardware or software control logic, Read-Only Memory (ROM), and/or other types of nonvolatile memory. Additional components of an IHS may include one or more disk drives, one or more network ports for communicating with external devices as well as various I/O devices, such as a keyboard, a mouse, touchscreen, and/or a video display. As described, an IHS may also include one or more buses operable to transmit communications between the various hardware components. An example of an IHS is described in more detail below.

FIG. 2 shows an example of an IHS 200 configured to implement systems and methods described herein for supporting validation of the secure assembly and delivery of multiple IHSs installed in a shared chassis. It should be appreciated that although the embodiments described herein may describe an IHS that is a compute sled or similar computing component that may be deployed within the bays of a chassis, other embodiments may be implemented via other types of IHSs that may also support validation of the hardware components of the IHS, validation of shared hardware components of a chassis in which an IHS is installed and/or validation of the hardware components used in computing solutions that are implemented using multiple IHSs. In the illustrative embodiment of FIG. 2, IHS 200 may be a computing component, such as compute sled 105 a-n or other type of server, such as an 1RU server installed within a 2RU chassis, that is configured to share infrastructure resources provided by a chassis 100.

The IHS 200 of FIG. 2 may be a compute sled, such as compute sleds 105 a-n of FIG. 1, that may be installed within a chassis, that may in turn be installed within a rack. Installed in this manner, IHS 200 may utilize shared power, network and cooling resources provided by the chassis and/or rack. Embodiments of IHS 200 may include a wide variety of different hardware configurations. Such variations in hardware configuration may result from IHS 200 being factory assembled to include components specified by a customer that has contracted for manufacture and delivery of IHS 200. As described in additional detail below, IHS 200 may include capabilities that allow a customer to validate that the hardware components of IHS 200 are the same hardware components that were installed at the factory during its manufacture. As described, an IHS 200 may be installed within a chassis along without other IHSs and may share use of various hardware components of the chassis. Accordingly, embodiments support the ability for IHS 200 and other similarly configured IHSs installed within a chassis to validate that such shared chassis hardware components are the same hardware components that were installed at the factory during manufacture of the shared chassis. IHS 200 may also support embodiments capable of validating the hardware components of a computing solution that is implemented using IHS 200 and using other IHSs that have factory provisioned as described below and that are installed in a chassis shared with IHS 200.

IHS 200 may utilize one or more processors 205. In some embodiments, processors 205 may include a main processor and a co-processor, each of which may include a plurality of processing cores that, in certain scenarios, may each be used to run an instance of a server process. In certain embodiments, one or all of processor(s) 205 may be graphics processing units (GPUs) in scenarios where IHS 200 has been configured to support functions such as multimedia services and graphics applications. In some embodiments, each of the processors 205 may be uniquely identified based on a code or other identifier that may be permanently encoded in a respective processor 205 by its manufacturer. As described below, embodiments support validation of processors 205 as being the same processors that were installed at the factory during the manufacture of IHS 200.

As illustrated, processor(s) 205 includes an integrated memory controller 205 a that may be implemented directly within the circuitry of the processor 205, or the memory controller 205 a may be a separate integrated circuit that is located on the same die as the processor 205. The memory controller 205 a may be configured to manage the transfer of data to and from the system memory 210 of the IHS 205 via a high-speed memory interface 205 b. The system memory 210 is coupled to processor(s) 205 via a memory bus 205 b that provides the processor(s) 205 with high-speed memory used in the execution of computer program instructions by the processor(s) 205. Accordingly, system memory 210 may include memory components, such as static RAM (SRAM), dynamic RAM (DRAM), NAND Flash memory, suitable for supporting high-speed memory operations by the processor(s) 205. In certain embodiments, system memory 210 may combine both persistent, non-volatile memory and volatile memory.

In certain embodiments, the system memory 210 may be comprised of multiple removable memory modules. The system memory 210 of the illustrated embodiment includes removable memory modules 210 a-n. Each of the removable memory modules 210 a-n may correspond to a printed circuit board memory socket that receives a removable memory module 210 a-n, such as a DIMM (Dual In-line Memory Module), that can be coupled to the socket and then decoupled from the socket as needed, such as to upgrade memory capabilities or to replace faulty memory modules. Other embodiments of IHS system memory 210 may be configured with memory socket interfaces that correspond to different types of removable memory module form factors, such as a Dual In-line Package (DIP) memory, a Single In-line Pin Package (SIPP) memory, a Single In-line Memory Module (SIMM), and/or a Ball Grid Array (BGA) memory. In some embodiments, each of the memory modules 210 a-n may be uniquely identified based on a code or other identifier that may be permanently encoded in a respective memory module 210 a-n by its manufacturer. As described below, embodiments support validation of memory modules 210 a-n as being the same memory modules that were installed at the factory during the manufacture of IHS 200.

IHS 200 may utilize a chipset that may be implemented by integrated circuits that are connected to each processor 205. All or portions of the chipset may be implemented directly within the integrated circuitry of an individual processor 205. The chipset may provide the processor(s) 205 with access to a variety of resources accessible via one or more in-band buses 215. Various embodiments may utilize any number of buses to provide the illustrated pathways served by in-band bus 215. In certain embodiments, in-band bus 215 may include a PCIe (PCI Express) switch fabric that is accessed via a PCIe root complex. IHS 200 may also include one or more I/O ports 250, such as PCIe ports, that may be used to couple the IHS 200 directly to other IHSs, storage resources and/or other peripheral components.

As illustrated, IHS 200 may include one or more FPGA (Field-Programmable Gate Array) cards 220. Each of the FPGA card 220 supported by IHS 200 may include various processing and memory resources, in addition to an FPGA logic unit that may include circuits that can be reconfigured after deployment of IHS 200 through programming functions supported by the FPGA card 220. Through such reprogramming of such logic units, each individual FGPA card 220 may be optimized to perform specific processing tasks, such as specific signal processing, security, data mining, and artificial intelligence functions, and/or to support specific hardware coupled to IHS 200. In some embodiments, a single FPGA card 220 may include multiple FPGA logic units, each of which may be separately programmed to implement different computing operations, such as in computing different operations that are being offloaded from processor 205. The FPGA card 220 may also include a management controller 220 a that may support interoperation with the remote access controller 255 via a sideband device management bus 275 a. In some embodiments, each of the FPGA cards 220 installed in IHS 200 may be uniquely identified based on a code or other identifier that may be permanently encoded in the FPGA card 220 by its manufacturer. As described below, embodiments support validation of FPGA card 220 as being the same FPGA card that was installed at the factory during the manufacture of IHS 200.

Processor(s) 205 may also be coupled to a network controller 225 via in-band bus 215, such as provided by a Network Interface Controller (NIC) that allows the IHS 200 to communicate via an external network, such as the Internet or a LAN. In some embodiments, network controller 225 may be a replaceable expansion card or adapter that is coupled to a motherboard connector of IHS 200. In some embodiments, network controller 225 may be an integrated component of IHS 200. In some embodiments, network controller 225 may be uniquely identified based on a code or other identifier, such as a MAC address, that may be permanently encoded in a non-volatile memory of network controller 225 by its manufacturer. As described below, embodiments support validation of network controller 225 as being the same network controller that was installed at the factory during the manufacture of IHS 200.

IHS 200 may include one or more storage controllers 230 that may be utilized to access storage drives 240 a-n that are accessible via the chassis in which IHS 200 is installed. Storage controllers 230 may provide support for RAID (Redundant Array of Independent Disks) configurations of logical and physical storage drives 240 a-n. In some embodiments, storage controller 230 may be an HBA (Host Bus Adapter) that provides more limited capabilities in accessing physical storage drives 240 a-n. In some embodiments, storage drives 240 a-n may be replaceable, hot-swappable storage devices that are installed within bays provided by the chassis in which IHS 200 is installed. In some embodiments, storage drives 240 a-n may also be accessed by other IHSs that are also installed within the same chassis as IHS 200. Although a single storage controller 230 is illustrated in FIG. 2, IHS 200 may include multiple storage controllers that may operate similarly to storage controller 230. In embodiments where storage drives 240 a-n are hot-swappable devices that are received by bays of chassis, the storage drives 240 a-n may be coupled to IHS 200 via couplings between the bays of the chassis and a midplane or backplane 245 of IHS 200. Storage drives 240 a-n may include SAS (Serial Attached SCSI) magnetic disk drives, SATA (Serial Advanced Technology Attachment) magnetic disk drives, solid-state drives (SSDs) and other types of storage drives in various combinations. In some embodiments, storage controllers 230 and storage drives 240 a-n may each be uniquely identified based on a code or other identifier that may be permanently encoded in a non-volatile memory of these devices by their respective manufacturers. As described below, embodiments support validation of storage controllers 230 and storage drives 240 a-n as being the same components that were installed at the factory during the manufacture of IHS 200.

A variety of additional components may be coupled to processor(s) 205 via in-band bus 215. For instance, processor(s) 205 may also be coupled to a power management unit 260 that may interface with the power system unit 135 of the chassis 100 in which an IHS, such as a compute sled, may be installed. In certain embodiments, a graphics processor 235 may be comprised within one or more video or graphics cards, or an embedded controller, installed as components of the IHS 200. In certain embodiments, graphics processor 235 may be an integrated component of the remote access controller 255 and may be utilized to support the display of diagnostic and administrative interfaces related to IHS 200 via display devices that are coupled, either directly or remotely, to remote access controller 255. In some embodiments, components such as power management unit 260 and graphics processor 235 may also be uniquely identified based on a code or other identifier that may be permanently encoded in a non-volatile memory of these components by their respective manufacturer. As described below, embodiments support validation of these components as being components that were installed at the factory during the manufacture of IHS 200.

In certain embodiments, IHS 200 may operate using a BIOS (Basic Input/Output System) that may be stored in a non-volatile memory accessible by the processor(s) 205. The BIOS may provide an abstraction layer by which the operating system of the IHS 200 interfaces with the hardware components of the IHS. Upon powering or restarting IHS 200, processor(s) 205 may utilize BIOS instructions to initialize and test hardware components coupled to the IHS, including both components permanently installed as components of the motherboard of IHS 200 and removable components installed within various expansion slots supported by the IHS 200. The BIOS instructions may also load an operating system for use by the IHS 200. In certain embodiments, IHS 200 may utilize Unified Extensible Firmware Interface (UEFI) in addition to or instead of a BIOS. In certain embodiments, the functions provided by a BIOS may be implemented, in full or in part, by the remote access controller 255. As described in additional detail below, in some embodiments, BIOS may be configured to identify hardware components that are detected as being currently installed in IHS 200. In such instances, the BIOS may support queries that provide the described unique identifiers that have been associated with each of these detected hardware components by their respective manufacturers.

In some embodiments, IHS 200 may include a TPM (Trusted Platform Module) that may include various registers, such as platform configuration registers, and a secure storage, such as an NVRAM (Non-Volatile Random-Access Memory). The TPM may also include a cryptographic processor that supports various cryptographic capabilities. In IHS embodiments that include a TPM, a pre-boot process implemented by the TPM may utilize its cryptographic capabilities to calculate hash values that are based on software and/or firmware instructions utilized by certain core components of IHS, such as the BIOS and boot loader of IHS 200. These calculated hash values may then be compared against reference hash values that were previously stored in a secure non-volatile memory of the IHS, such as during factory provisioning of IHS 200. In this manner, a TPM may establish a root of trust that includes core components of IHS 200 that are validated as operating using instructions that originate from a trusted source.

As described, IHS 200 may include a remote access controller 255 that supports remote management of IHS 200 and of various internal components of IHS 200. In certain embodiments, remote access controller 255 may operate from a different power plane from the processors 205 and other components of IHS 200, thus allowing the remote access controller 255 to operate, and management tasks to proceed, while the processing cores of IHS 200 are powered off. As described, various functions provided by the BIOS, including launching the operating system of the IHS 200, may be implemented by the remote access controller 255. In some embodiments, the remote access controller 255 may perform various functions to verify the integrity of the IHS 200 and its hardware components prior to initialization of the operating system of IHS 200 (i.e., in a bare-metal state). In some embodiments, certain operations of the remote access controller 225, such as the described inventory certificate generation and validation operations, may operate using validated instructions, and thus within the root of trust of IHS 200.

In some embodiments, remote access controller 255 may be uniquely identified based on a code or other identifier that may be permanently encoded in a non-volatile memory of the remote access controller 255 by its manufacturer. As described below, embodiments support validation of remote access controller 255 as being the same controller that was installed at the factory during the manufacture of IHS 200. In scenarios where remote access controller 255 of IHS 200 is replaced, embodiments support validation that replacement remote access controller installed by a customer in IHS 200 is the same remote access controller that was supplied to the customer by a trusted entity. Also as described below, during a provisioning phase of the factory assembly of IHS 200, a signed certificate that specifies factory installed hardware components of IHS 200 that were installed during manufacture of the IHS 200 may be stored in a non-volatile memory that is accessed by remote access controller 255. Using this signed inventory certificate stored by the remote access controller 255, a customer may validate that the detected hardware components of IHS 200 are the same hardware components that were installed at the factory during manufacture of IHS 200.

As described in additional detail below, during a provisioning phase of the factory assembly of IHS 200, a signed inventory certificate that specifies an inventory of the factory installed hardware components of IHS may be stored in a non-volatile memory that is accessed by remote access controller 255. Using this signed inventory certificate stored by the remote access controller 255, a customer may validate that the detected hardware components of IHS 200 are the same hardware components that were installed at the factory during manufacture of IHS 200. Also as described below, remote access controller 255 may also store a solution inventory certificate and/or a chassis inventory certificate in such a non-volatile memory. In some embodiments, a remote access controller 255 may transfer any of these inventory certificates with other IHSs installed in the same chassis via communications between the remote access controller 255 and a chassis management controller of the shared chassis, such as described above.

In some embodiments, remote access controller 255 may similarly share detected hardware inventory information with other IHSs installed in same chassis. For instance, remote access controller 255 may transmit an inventory of detected hardware components of IHS 200 to a chassis management controller for sharing with one or more of the other IHSs installed in the same chassis. The remote access controller 255 may likewise receive from a chassis management controller one or more inventories of hardware components that are detected by other IHSs installed in the same chassis. Using such shared inventory information IHS 200 may compare the inventory listed in a solution inventory certificate against inventories reported by all IHSs that implement a computing solution in order to validate the computing solution is implemented by IHSs that are using only factory installed hardware components.

In support of the capabilities for validating the detected hardware components of IHS 200 against the inventory information that is specified in a signed inventory certificate, remote access controller 255 may support various cryptographic capabilities. For instance, remote access controller 255 may include capabilities for key generation such that remote access controller may generate keypairs that include a public key and a corresponding private key. As described in additional detail below, using generated keypairs, remote access controller 255 may digitally sign inventory information collected during the factory assembly of IHS 200 such that the integrity of this signed inventory information may be validated at a later time using the public key by a customer that has purchased IHS 200. Using these cryptographic capabilities of the remote access controller, the factory installed inventory information that is included in an inventory certificate may be anchored to a specific remote access controller 255, since the keypair used to sign the inventory information is signed using the private key that is generated and maintained by the remote access controller 255.

In some embodiment, the cryptographic capabilities of remote access controller 255 may also include safeguards for encrypting any private keys that are generated by the remote access controller and further anchoring them to components within the root of trust of IHS 200. For instance, a remote access controller 255 may include capabilities for accessing hardware root key (HRK) capabilities of IHS 200, such as for encrypting the private key of the keypair generated by the remote access controller. In some embodiments, the HRK may include a root key that is programmed into a fuse bank, or other immutable memory such as one-time programmable registers, during factory provisioning of IHS 200. The root key may be provided by a factory certificate authority, such as described below. By encrypting a private key using the hardware root key of IHS 200, the hardware inventory information that is signed using this private key is further anchored to the root of trust of IHS 200. If a root of trust cannot be established through validation of the remote access controller cryptographic functions that are used to access the hardware root key, the private key used to sign inventory information cannot be retrieved. In some embodiments, the private key that is encrypted by the remote access controller using the HRK may be stored to a replay protected memory block (RPMB) that is accessed using security protocols that require all commands accessing the RPMB to be digitally signed using a symmetric key and that include a nonce or other such value that prevents use of commands in replay attacks. Stored to an RPMB, the encrypted private key can only be retrieved by a component within the root of trust of IHS 200, such as the remote access controller 255.

As described above, a keypair generated by remote access controller 255 may be shared with other IHSs installed in same chassis as IHS 200 via communications with a chassis management controller of the shared chassis. In some scenarios, such as when IHS 200 is the first IHS of a shared chassis to be factory provisioned, remote access controller 255 may share a generated keypair with other IHSs via a chassis management controller of the chassis, where this shared keypair may be used to validate the hardware inventory included in a solution inventory certificate or in a chassis inventory certificate. In some scenarios, such as when IHS 200 is not the first IHS of a shared chassis to be factory provisioned, remote access controller 255 may be provided a shared keypair by a chassis management controller 125, where this shared keypair was generated by an already factory provisioned IHS from the same chassis as IHS 200.

Remote access controller 255 may include a service processor 255 a, or specialized microcontroller, that operates management software that supports remote monitoring and administration of IHS 200. Remote access controller 255 may be installed on the motherboard of IHS 200 or may be coupled to IHS 200 via an expansion slot provided by the motherboard. In support of remote monitoring functions, network adapter 225 c may support connections with remote access controller 255 using wired and/or wireless network connections via a variety of network technologies. As a non-limiting example of a remote access controller, the integrated Dell Remote Access Controller (iDRAC) from Dell® is embedded within Dell PowerEdge™ servers and provides functionality that helps information technology (IT) administrators deploy, update, monitor, and maintain servers remotely.

In some embodiments, remote access controller 255 may support monitoring and administration of various managed devices 220, 225, 230, 280 of an IHS via a sideband bus interface. For instance, messages utilized in device management may be transmitted using I2C sideband bus connections 275 a-d that may be individually established with each of the respective managed devices 220, 225, 230, 280 through the operation of an I2C multiplexer 255 d of the remote access controller. As illustrated, certain of the managed devices of IHS 200, such as non-standard hardware 220, network controller 225 and storage controller 230, are coupled to the IHS processor(s) 205 via an in-line bus 215, such as a PCIe root complex, that is separate from the I2C sideband bus connections 275 a-d used for device management. The management functions of the remote access controller 255 may utilize information collected by various managed sensors 280 located within the IHS. For instance, temperature data collected by sensors 280 may be utilized by the remote access controller 255 in support of closed-loop airflow cooling of the IHS 200.

In certain embodiments, the service processor 255 a of remote access controller 255 may rely on an I2C co-processor 255 b to implement sideband I2C communications between the remote access controller 255 and managed components 220, 225, 230, 280 of the IHS. The I2C co-processor 255 b may be a specialized co-processor or micro-controller that is configured to interface via a sideband I2C bus interface with the managed hardware components 220, 225, 230, 280 of IHS. In some embodiments, the I2C co-processor 255 b may be an integrated component of the service processor 255 a, such as a peripheral system-on-chip feature that may be provided by the service processor 255 a. Each I2C bus 275 a-d is illustrated as single line in FIG. 2. However, each I2C bus 275 a-d may be comprised of a clock line and data line that couple the remote access controller 255 to I2C endpoints 220 a, 225 a, 230 a, 280 a which may be referred to as modular field replaceable units (FRUs).

As illustrated, the I2C co-processor 255 b may interface with the individual managed devices 220, 225, 230, 280 via individual sideband I2C buses 275 a-d selected through the operation of an I2C multiplexer 255 d. Via switching operations by the I2C multiplexer 255 d, a sideband bus connection 275 a-d may be established by a direct coupling between the I2C co-processor 255 b and an individual managed device 220, 225, 230, 280. In providing sideband management capabilities, the I2C co-processor 255 b may each interoperate with corresponding endpoint I2C controllers 220 a, 225 a, 230 a, 280 a that implement the I2C communications of the respective managed devices 220, 225, 230. The endpoint I2C controllers 220 a, 225 a, 230 a, 280 a may be implemented as a dedicated microcontroller for communicating sideband I2C messages with the remote access controller 255, or endpoint I2C controllers 220 a, 225 a, 230 a, 280 a may be integrated SoC functions of a processor of the respective managed device endpoints 220, 225, 230, 280.

In various embodiments, an IHS 200 does not include each of the components shown in FIG. 2. In various embodiments, an IHS 200 may include various additional components in addition to those that are shown in FIG. 2. Furthermore, some components that are represented as separate components in FIG. 2 may in certain embodiments instead be integrated with other components. For example, in certain embodiments, all or a portion of the functionality provided by the illustrated components may instead be provided by components integrated into the one or more processor(s) 205 as a systems-on-a-chip.

FIG. 3 is a swim lane diagram illustrating certain responsibilities of components of a system configured according to certain embodiments for factory provisioning of an IHS in a manner that supports validation of the secure assembly and delivery of multiple IHSs installed in a shared chassis. FIG. 4 is a flowchart describing certain steps of a method, according to some embodiments, for assembly and provisioning of an IHS in a manner that supports validation of the secure assembly and delivery of multiple IHSs installed in a shared chassis. Some embodiments of the method of FIG. 4 may begin, at block 405, with the factory assembly of an IHS, such as the assembly of a server described with regard to FIGS. 1 and 2. In particular, an IHS may be installed within a chassis that supports multiple IHSs, such as 2RU chassis that supports two 1RU server IHSs, where each of the IHSs installed in the chassis may share use of certain chassis hardware components, such as storage drives, chassis management controllers, cooling systems and network components. Other chassis may support various numbers of IHSs. In these instances where multiple IHSs are housed within a shared chassis, the assembly of an IHS may include assembly of the IHS and may also include installation of the IHS within a chassis along with one or more other IHSs.

In some instances, an IHS may be manufactured using a factory process that includes multiple phases of assembly, validation and provisioning that must be completed before the IHS is supplied to a customer. As described, an IHS such as a server may be purpose-built for a particular customer such that the server is assembled and provisioned according to specifications provided by the customer. The initial factory assembly of such server IHSs may include the selection of a chassis and the fastening of various hardware components to the selected chassis. Such a factory assembly process may include generating a manifest that tracks the individual hardware components that are installed in an IHS and may also include a manifest of the shared chassis hardware components that are installed in the shared chassis. As described above, the installed hardware components may include standard components and may also include specialized components that have been requested by a specific customer that has contracted for the assembly and delivery of an IHS.

Once the assembly of an IHS has been completed, the IHS may be subjected to manual and automated inspections that confirm the IHS has been properly assembled and does not include any defects. In some scenarios, such inspections may be done prior to installation of the IHS within a chassis, while in other scenarios inspections of the IHS may be conducted after the IHS has been installed in a chassis. After confirming an IHS and chassis have been assembled without any manufacturing defects, at block 410, factory provisioning of the IHS may be initiated. In some instances, the provisioning of an IHS at the factory may include various stages that may include stages for loading of firmware, configuring hardware components, and installing an operating system and other software. As indicated in FIG. 3, various aspects of this factory provisioning process may be conducted using a factory provisioning application, where this factory provisioning application may run on one or more servers and may interface with an IHS that is being provisioned once a requisite amount of firmware and software has been installed to the IHS.

As described, a manifest of the individual hardware components that are installed in an IHS may be generated during assembly of the IHS. In some embodiments, a separate manifest may be generated that specifies the shared hardware components of a chassis in which the IHS is installed. In some embodiments, the manifest of the IHS may be augmented with the identities of any shared chassis components. In some embodiments, the manifest of an IHS installed in a shared chassis may identify the other IHSs that are also installed in the shared chassis. In such instances, a single manifest may be generated for a chassis and all of the IHSs installed in the chassis. Such manifests may be files that includes an entry for each component installed to an IHS or a chassis, where the entry may specify various characteristics of the component, such as model numbers and installation locations, and may also specify any unique identifiers associated with the component, such as a MAC address or a serial number. At block 415, one or more manifests generated during assembly of an IHS and a chassis are provided to the factory provisioning application that is being used to provision the assembled IHS. Based on this hardware manifest information, at block 420, the factory provisioning application may also initiate the generation of inventory certificates that may be used to validate that the detected hardware components of the IHS and the shared hardware of the chassis are the same hardware components that were installed during the factory assembly of the IHS and the chassis.

As described with regard to FIGS. 1 and 2, an IHS may include a remote access controller that provides capabilities for remote management of an IHS, where these remote management capabilities may include sideband management of various hardware components of an IHS. As indicated in FIG. 3, the generation of inventory certificates for a newly assembled IHS, at 325, may be initiated via a request from the factory provisioning application 305 to the remote access controller 310 of the IHS. As described with regard to FIG. 2, a remote access controller of an IHS may include cryptographic capabilities that operate within the root of trust of the IHS and that include the ability to generate cryptographic keypairs.

Utilizing such cryptographic capabilities, at block 425, the remote access controller 310 initiates the generation of an IHS inventory certificate by generating a cryptographic key pair for use in validating the authenticity of the IHS hardware inventory information that will be included in an IHS inventory certificate. As described, an IHS may be installed in a shared chassis along with multiple other similarly configured IHSs. As such, in some instances, the IHS that is being factory provisioned is not the first IHS from a shared chassis to be provisioned. In such instances, in some embodiments, where another IHS in the shared chassis has already been provisioned, subsequent IHSs do not generate their own keypair. Instead, the factory provisioning application may provide the subsequent IHSs with the keypair that was generated by the first IHS that was provisioned from the shared chassis. As described above, in some embodiments, keypairs may be transferred between IHSs of a shared chassis via a chassis management controller of the shared chassis. In this manner, all of the IHSs installed in a shared chassis may utilize a shared keypair for use in validating the hardware of a computing solution that spans all of these IHSs, where this combined hardware of a computing solution may be specified in a solution inventory certificate.

In some embodiments, a shared keypair may only be used in this manner for the validation of chassis hardware components that are shared by all IHSs installed in the chassis. In such embodiments, the first IHS of a shared chassis that is provisioned may generate a first keypair for use in validating its own IHS inventory certificate that specifies the hardware components of that particular IHS. This first IHS from the shared chassis that is provisioned also generates a second cryptographic keypair for shared use in validating the authenticity of shared chassis hardware inventory information that will be included in a separate chassis inventory certificate. In such embodiments, each subsequent IHS from the shared chassis that is provisioned generates a keypair for validating its own IHS inventory certificate and is provided the shared keypair for use in validating shared hardware inventory from the chassis inventory certificate.

At block 430 and at 330, the remote access controller 310 generates one or more certificate signing requests (CSRs) for digital identity certificates. One of these requests may specify the public key of the first key pair generated by the remote access controller and also specifies the factory installed hardware inventory from the manifest that was generated during assembly of the IHS. In some embodiments, another request may specify the public key of the second key pair generated by the remote access controller and also specifies an inventory of the factory installed shared hardware components of the chassis in which the IHS is installed. The factory installed hardware inventory information included in the CSRs may be signed by the remote access controller using the private keys from the respective keypairs. At block 435 and at 335, the CSRs for the requested inventory certificates are transmitted to the factory provisioning application 305 by the remote access controller 310. At block 440, the remote access controller safeguards the private keys from the generated key pairs. In some embodiments, the remote access controller may encrypt the private keys using the hardware root key (HRK) of the IHS and may store the encrypted keys to a protected memory, such as the replay protected memory block that is described with regard to FIG. 2.

Upon receiving the certificate signing request(s) from the remote access controller 310, at block 445 and at 340, the factory provisioning application 305 submits the CSRs for signing by a factory certificate authority 315. In some embodiments, the factory provisioning application 305 specifies a factory key to be used by the factory certificate authority 315 in signing the inventory certificate(s). For instance, the factory provisioning application may include the name of a trusted certificate associated with a factory key as an attribute of the CSRs that are transmitted to the factory certificate authority 315. Upon receipt of the CSRs, at block 450, the factory certificate authority parses from the CSRs: the hardware inventory information of the IHS and of the chassis, the public key(s) generated by the remote access controller and the information specifying the requested signing key. Based on the information parsed from the CSRs, the factory certificate authority generates one or more digital identity certificates, referred to herein as inventory certificates. In some embodiments, the factory certificate authority may generate an identity certificate, referred to herein as an IHS inventory certificate, that is associated with the first public key generated by the remote access controller and specifies the factory installed hardware inventory of the IHS. In some embodiments, the factory certificate authority may generate a second identity certificate, referred to herein as a chassis inventory certificate, that is associated with the second public key generated by the remote access controller and specifies the factory installed shared hardware inventory of the chassis. In some embodiments, the factory certificate authority may instead generate a single solution inventory certificate that is associated with a single public key generated by the remote access controller and that specifies the hardware inventory of the IHS, the shared hardware inventory of the chassis and which is augmented with the hardware inventory of the other IHSs that are installed in this shared chassis as each IHS is factory provisioned. In embodiments that generate a solution inventory certificate, each IHS that is being factory provisioned provides a CSR that includes its own inventory of factory installed hardware and inventories of factory installed hardware of any already provisioned IHSs from the shared chassis, where these inventories may be retrieved through queries submitted to a chassis management controller of the shared chassis.

As indicated in FIG. 3, at 345, the factory certificate authority 315 submits the generated inventory certificate(s) for signing by a hardware security module 320 that may be a dedicated hardware component of a factory provisioning server that safeguards cryptographic keys and implements cryptographic functions utilized in the factory provisioning process. In some embodiments, the factory certificate authority 315 may also specify a certificate name associated with a signing key that is maintained by the hardware security module 320. At 350, the hardware security module 320 utilizes the private key associated with the specified certificate in order to digitally sign the submitted inventory certificate(s). The signed inventory certificate(s) are then returned to the factory certificate authority 315 by the hardware security module 320.

Once the inventory certificate(s) have been signed, at block 460 and at 355, the signed inventory certificate(s) are transmitted from the factory certificate authority 315 to the factory provisioning application 305. As indicated in FIG. 3 at 357, the factory provisioning application 305 may store copies of the signed inventory certificate(s). In some instances, the copies may be saved to a data store utilized in providing ongoing support of the IHS once the IHS has been shipped and has been deployed by a customer. Using these stored copies of the signed inventory certificate(s), a trusted entity providing ongoing support of IHS may validate that an inventory of detected hardware reported by the IHS matches the factory installed hardware of the IHS and chassis. In addition, the trusted entity may utilize the stored inventory certificate(s) to provide the IHS with new or updated inventory certificate(s) that reflect replacement and/or new hardware that was supplied for installation in the IHS or chassis. Using an inventory certificate that includes updated inventory information, an administrator may confirm that a hardware modification corresponds to a genuine component that was supplied by the trusted entity.

At block 465 and at 360, the signed inventory certificate(s) are then loaded to the assembled IHS. As indicated in FIG. 3, in some embodiments, the signed inventory certificate(s) may be uploaded to a remote access controller 310 of the assembled IHS, such that the signed inventory certificate(s) may be stored to a nonvolatile memory or other persistent storage that is accessible by the remote access controller 310 independent from the operating system of the IHS. In other embodiments, the signed inventory certificate(s) may be uploaded without reliance on the remote access controller to another non-volatile memory of the IHS. In some embodiments, signed inventory certificates may be shared with other IHSs by also storing a copy of the certificate to a chassis management controller of the shared chassis.

Some embodiments may continue, at 365, with the validation of the signed inventory certificate(s) by the remote access controller 310. Using the public keys from the generated keypairs, at block 475, the remote access controller decrypts the signatures included by the remote access controller in the CSR and confirms that the IHS inventory included in an IHS inventory certificate and the chassis inventory included in a chassis inventory certificate match the inventory information that was submitted in the certificate signing request(s), thus validating the integrity of the generation of the signed inventory certificate(s). At block 485, the remote access controller confirms that the inventories included in the signed inventory certificate(s) are valid and, at 370, the remote access controller 310 confirms the validity of the inventory certificate(s) with a notification to the factory provisioning application 305.

With the generation and validation of the signed inventory certificate(s) completed for one IHS of a shared chassis, factory provisioning may continue using the procedures of FIGS. 3 and 4 for provisioning of additional IHSs that are installed or will be installed within the shared chassis. As described, various inventory certificates may be utilized in validating the hardware inventory of an IHS, a shared chassis and/or a computing solution that spans multiple IHSs installed in the shared chassis. In some embodiments, the first IHS to be factory provisioned from a shared chassis generates a keypair to be shared with the other IHSs installed in the shared chassis. In some embodiments, the shared keypair may be used to validate the hardware inventory in a solution inventory certificate that specifies the hardware utilized in a computing solution that spans multiple IHSs installed in the shared chassis. In some embodiments, the shared keypair may be used to validate the shared hardware inventory of the chassis specified within a chassis inventory certificate, in which case each IHS in the shared chassis may separately utilize a private keypair for validation of its own hardware inventory specified within an IHS inventory certificate. In all embodiments, as indicated at 375 of FIG. 3, with the completion of factory provisioning of the first IHS from a shared chassis, each successive IHS of the shared chassis is provisioned and is provided a shared keypair that was generated at block 425 by the initial IHS to be provisioned. As described, embodiments may share such keypairs via communications with a chassis management controller of the shared chassis. This shared keypair may also be stored by each IHS as it provisioned in the manner described with regard to FIGS. 3 and 4. In embodiments utilizing a solution inventory certificate, each successive IHS that is provisioned adds its factory installed hardware inventory to the inventory specified in the solution inventory certificate and submits the updated certificate for signing. When all of the IHSs installed in the chassis have been factory provisioned that final solution certificate includes inventories for each of the IHSs and may also include an inventory of shared chassis hardware. Once factory provisioning of all of the IHSs installed in a shared chassis is completed, at block 495, the assembled IHSs and shared chassis may be shipped from the factory to a customer.

Upon delivery of the IHS, embodiments provide a customer with the capability of validating that the delivered IHS and chassis includes only hardware components that were installed at the factory during manufacture of the IHS and chassis. Embodiments thus support an initial validation of the secure assembly and delivery of an IHS and chassis. FIGS. 5 and 6 describe embodiments for use in the validation of the secure assembly and delivery of multiple IHSs installed in a shared chassis. Accordingly, FIG. 5 is a swim lane diagram illustrating certain responsibilities of components of an IHS configured according to certain embodiments for an initial validation of the secure assembly and delivery of an IHS installed in a shared chassis. FIG. 6 is a flowchart describing certain steps of a method, according to some embodiments, for the initial validation of the secure assembly and delivery of an IHS installed in a shared chassis. Embodiments may begin, at block 605, with the delivery of an IHS and a shared chassis to a customer, where the IHS has been assembled and provisioned according to the procedures set forth above. In particular, the delivered IHS has been provisioned at the factory to include one or more signed inventory certificates that may include: an IHS inventory certificate that specifies the factory installed hardware components of the IHS, a chassis inventory certificate that specifies shared factory installed hardware components of the chassis and/or a solution inventory certificate that specifies the hardware components of multiple IHSs installed in the shared chassis. In addition, a factory provisioned IHS stores one or more keypairs, one of which is a shared keypair for using in validating solution inventory information or shared chassis inventory information.

Upon receiving an IHS and chassis configured in this manner, at block 610, the IHS and chassis may be unpacked, assembled and initialized by an administrator. In some instances, the delivered IHS may be installed within the shared chassis. In other instances, the IHS and shared chassis may be separately packaged, in which case an administrator installs the IHS in the shared chassis. In some instances, an IHS may be ready for immediate deployment by a customer. In other instances, an IHS may require further provisioning by a customer before it is deployed, such as for operation within a particular data center. As such, in various scenarios, an IHS may be unpacked, assembled and initialized in order to deploy the IHS, or in order to prepare it for further provisioning. At block 615, the IHS is installed in the shared chassis and has been powered and a validation process of the IHS is initialized. In some embodiments, validation process may run within a pre-boot environment, such as a PXE (Preboot eXecution Environment) operating environment. In some embodiments, a PXE operating environment in which a validation process runs may be retrieved from a network location and may thus be executed using the processing and memory capabilities of the IHS. In some embodiments, a PXE operating environment may be retrieved using secure protocols, such as HTTPS, in order to assure the integrity of the operating environment instructions that are utilized. In some embodiments, a pre-boot operating environment in which the validation process runs may include an operating environment that is executed by the remote access controller of the IHS based on validated firmware instructions. In these embodiments that utilize a pre-boot operating environment, the validation of the detected hardware components of the IHS is conducted prior to booting of the operating system of the IHS.

In some embodiments, the validation process may run as part of a diagnostic mode that is supported by an IHS. For instance, an IHS may support a diagnostic mode that may be initiated by a user or may be initiated automatically in response to detecting various conditions, where the diagnostic mode may support various diagnostic tools, including the described hardware validation procedures. In some embodiments, the diagnostic mode may involve re-booting the IHS to a diagnostic environment, while other embodiments may support diagnostic mode operations that run within the operating system of the IHS. Accordingly, some embodiments may support the described hardware validation procedures as a feature available within the operating system of the IHS. In such embodiments, the operating system may be configured to periodically conduct the described hardware validation procedures, such as on a daily or weekly basis. The operating system may likewise be configured to conduct the hardware validation procedures in response to a detected security notification, such as a notification that a process is attempting to access a protected resource. In some embodiments, the described validation procedures may be implemented remotely, such as via the described HTTPS protocols, where the remote validation procedures may rely both on information retrieved from the IHS via HTTPS and on remote information, such as information maintained by the manufacturer of the IHS or by an entity supporting the administration of the IHS.

At block 620 and as indicated at 535 of FIG. 5, an inventory certificate validation process 510 is initiated within a validation environment 505 that may include a pre-boot environment, a diagnostic environment or other environment supporting the validation process. In some embodiments, the inventory certificate validation process 510 operates based on validated instructions, such as based on instructions that, when used to calculate a hash value, are confirmed to correspond to a value stored in an immutable memory of the IHS during its factory provisioning. In this manner, the inventory certificate validation process may be added to the root of trust of the IHS. At block 625 and as indicated at 540, the inventory certificate validation process 510 retrieves the signed inventory certificate(s) from the remote access controller 525 or from a persistent memory of the IHS. At block 630 and as indicated at 545, the inventory certificate validation process 510 parses the factory installed hardware inventory of the IHS from a retrieved IHS inventory certificate, or from a solution inventory certificate. In addition, inventory certificate validation process 510 may parse a shared chassis hardware inventory from a retrieved chassis inventory certificate, or from a solution inventory certificate. Using the public keys provided in the respective inventory certificate, the inventory validation process 510 may confirm the integrity of the inventory information that is included in each of the signed inventory certificates. In the case of a solution inventory certificate or a chassis inventory certificate, the keys used in validating the integrity inventory information in these certificates is from a keypair that is shared with the other IHSs in a shared chassis.

In some scenarios, the inventory certificate validation process 510 may commence by collecting an inventory of the detected hardware components of the IHS and the shared hardware components of the chassis in which the IHS is installed. In scenarios that utilize a solution inventory certificate, the validation process may also retrieve detected hardware inventory information for other IHSs installed in the shared chassis by queries supported by a chassis management controller of the shared chassis. Each of the IHSs may collect an inventory of detected hardware components in the described manner. In some instances, this collection of inventory information may be initiated earlier by the inventory certificate validation process, such as during initialization of the IHS. At block 635 and as indicated at 550, the inventory certificate validation process 510 may query the BIOS 515 of the IHS for an inventory of hardware components that have been detected by BIOS 515. At block 640 and as indicated at 555, the inventory certificate validation process 510 may retrieve additional hardware inventory information from a Trusted Platform Module (TPM) 520 of the IHS. In some instances, the TPM 520 may identify hardware components that are also identified by BIOS 515. However, in some instances, the TPM 520 may identify certain hardware components, such as secure memory modules, that are not identified by BIOS 515.

As described with regard to FIG. 2, a Trusted Platform Module may serve to establish an initial hardware root of trust in an IHS such that the hardware components within this root of trust operate using validated software instructions. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the inventory certificate validation process 510 may compare identity information for the detected TPM 520 against the TPM identity information that is parsed from the IHS inventory certificate at block 545. In some instances, the detection of any discrepancies between the identity of the TPM specified in the IHS inventory certificate and the identity reported by TPM 520 may result in terminating any further validation procedures.

At block 645 and as indicated at 560, the inventory certificate validation process 510 may retrieve additional hardware inventory information from a remote access controller 525 of the IHS. As with TPM 520, remote access controller 525 may provide redundant identification of some hardware components and may provide exclusive identification of other hardware components, such as shared chassis components and such as internal memories, management controllers or logic units utilized by the remote access controller 525. Also as with TPM 520, in some embodiments, the inventory certificate validation process 510 may compare identity information for the detected remote access controller 525 against the remote access controller identity information that is parsed from the IHS inventory certificate at block 545. In some instances, the detection of any discrepancies between the identity of the remote access controller specified in the IHS inventory certificate and the identity reported by remote access controller 525 may also result in terminating any further validation procedures.

At block 650 and as indicated at 565, the inventory certificate validation process 510 retrieves inventory information from the chassis in which the IHS is installed. For instance, the validation process may query a chassis management controller of a chassis, such as described with regard to FIG. 1, in order to retrieve an inventory of the shared hardware components of the chassis, such as shared storage drives, cooling systems and network controllers. In some instances, the hardware inventory provided by the chassis management controller may specify hardware components that have already been identified by the prior hardware inventory collection queries, such as via queries to the remote access controller.

Upon completion of the collection of the detected hardware components of the initialized IHS and of the chassis, at block 570, the inventory certificate validation process compares the collected inventory information against the inventory information that is parsed from the inventory certificates. Accordingly, at block 655, the inventory certificate validation process may confirm the identity of the detected TPM against the identity of the TPM reported in the IHS inventory certificate. If the identity of the TPM is successfully validated, validation may continue at block 660. However, if the identity of the TPM is not validated, at block 680, the inventory certificate validation process may signal a core inventory validation failure since any discrepancies between the identity of the factory installed TPM and the TPM that has been detected in the initialized IHS signals a potential compromise in the root of trusted hardware components of the IHS.

At block 660, the inventory certificate validation process may confirm the identity of the detected remote access controller against the identity of the remote access controller reported in the IHS inventory certificate. If the remote access controller is successfully validated, validation may continue at block 665. Otherwise, if the identity of the remote access controller is not validated, at block 680, the inventory certificate validation process may signal a core inventory validation failure. As with the TPM, any discrepancies between the identity of the factory installed remote access controller and the remote access controller detected in the initialized IHS signals a potential compromise of the root of trust of the IHS.

At block 665, the inventory certificate validation process continues the comparison of the detected hardware components of the initialized IHS against the identities of the factory installed hardware components that are included in the inventory certificate(s). At block 667, the inventory certificate validation process compares the detected chassis hardware components against the identities of the factory installed hardware components that are included in the inventory certificate(s). In scenarios where the inventory of a solution inventory certificate is being validated, the validation process may compare inventory information for each IHS in a shared chassis against the factory installed inventory of hardware for that particular IHS that is included in the solution inventory certificate. In such instances, the validation process may separately validate the detected hardware from each of the IHSs in the shared chassis and may identify discrepancies between the detected hardware by each of the IHSs and the factor installed hardware for each of the IHSs as it is included in a solution inventory certificate. If the unique identifiers of the detected hardware components of the IHS and of the chassis match the identifiers of the factory installed hardware components from the inventory certificates, at block 670, the inventory certificate validation process signals a successful validation of the detected hardware of the IHS and of the shared chassis hardware. The customer receiving delivery of the IHS is thus assured that the IHS is operating using only hardware components that were installed at the factory during manufacture of the IHS. In embodiments that validate an inventory included in a solution inventory certificate, validation of such a certificate assures a customer that a computing solution is being implanted using multiple IHSs that are all utilizing only factory installed hardware components.

If any discrepancies are detected between the detected hardware components of the IHS or chassis and the hardware components reported in the signed inventory certificates, at block 675, a partial validation of the hardware inventory of the IHS and/or chassis may be reported. In some instances, such discrepancies may result from failure to detect hardware components that are specified in one of the signed inventory certificates. In some instances, such discrepancies may result from mismatched identity information between the detected hardware components and the components listed in the inventory certificates, such as discrepancies in the serial numbers or other unique identifiers associated with a hardware component. In other instances, such discrepancies may result from the detection of hardware components that are not present in either of the signed inventory certificates. Any discrepancies may be reported to an administrator, thus allowing an administrator to investigate further and, in some instances, to choose to authorize booting of the IHS despite the identified discrepancies.

It should be understood that various operations described herein may be implemented in software executed by logic or processing circuitry, hardware, or a combination thereof. The order in which each operation of a given method is performed may be changed, and various operations may be added, reordered, combined, omitted, modified, etc. It is intended that the invention(s) described herein embrace all such modifications and changes and, accordingly, the above description should be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.

Although the invention(s) is/are described herein with reference to specific embodiments, various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the present invention(s), as set forth in the claims below. Accordingly, the specification and figures are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present invention(s). Any benefits, advantages, or solutions to problems that are described herein with regard to specific embodiments are not intended to be construed as a critical, required, or essential feature or element of any or all the claims.

Unless stated otherwise, terms such as “first” and “second” are used to arbitrarily distinguish between the elements such terms describe. Thus, these terms are not necessarily intended to indicate temporal or other prioritization of such elements. The terms “coupled” or “operably coupled” are defined as connected, although not necessarily directly, and not necessarily mechanically. The terms “a” and “an” are defined as one or more unless stated otherwise. The terms “comprise” (and any form of comprise, such as “comprises” and “comprising”), “have” (and any form of have, such as “has” and “having”), “include” (and any form of include, such as “includes” and “including”) and “contain” (and any form of contain, such as “contains” and “containing”) are open-ended linking verbs. As a result, a system, device, or apparatus that “comprises,” “has,” “includes” or “contains” one or more elements possesses those one or more elements but is not limited to possessing only those one or more elements. Similarly, a method or process that “comprises,” “has,” “includes” or “contains” one or more operations possesses those one or more operations but is not limited to possessing only those one or more operations. 

The invention claimed is:
 1. A method for validating secure assembly and delivery of a shared chassis comprising two or more IHSs (Information Handling Systems), the method comprising, during factory-provisioning of the chassis: generating, by a remote access controller of a first of the IHSs installed in the shared chassis, a first certificate signing request (CSR) that identifies an inventory of factory-installed hardware components of the first IHS and further generating a second CSR that identifies components of the chassis that are shared by the two or more IHSs installed in the chassis; transmitting, by the remote access controller of the first IHS, the first CSR and the second CSR to a factory certificate authority; uploading a first inventory certificate generated by the factory certificate authority from the first CSR to a secured memory utilized by the remote access controller and a second inventory certificate generated by the factory certificate authority from the second CSR to a shared component of the chassis; and upon delivery of the chassis: retrieving, by a validation process of the first IHS, the first inventory certificate uploaded to the secured memory utilized by the remote access controller of the first IHS and the second inventory certificate uploaded to the shared component of the chassis; collecting, by the validation process of the first IHS, an inventory of detected hardware components of the first IHS and an inventory of detected shared hardware components in the chassis; and comparing, by the validation process of the first IHS, the detected inventory of hardware components of the first IHS against the first inventory certificate in order to validate the detected hardware components of the first IHS are the same components installed during factory-assembly of the chassis and further comparing the detected inventory of shared hardware components in the chassis against the second inventory certificate in order to validate the detected shared hardware components of the chassis as the same shared components of the chassis installed during factory assembly of the chassis.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the second inventory certificate that specifies the shared hardware components of the chassis is uploaded to a chassis management controller that manages shared hardware components of the chassis.
 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the shared hardware components comprise persistent storage accessible by each of the two or more IHSs installed in the shared chassis.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the inventory of factory installed hardware components included in the first inventory certificate is signed by the factory certificate authority using a first keypair that is generated by the first IHS during the factory provisioning of the first IHS, and wherein the inventory of factory-installed shared hardware components included in the second inventory certificate is signed by the factory certificate authority using a second keypair that is generated by the first IHS during the factory provisioning of the first IHS.
 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the second keypair is shared with each of the IHSs installed in the shared chassis during factory provisioning of each of the IHSs.
 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the second keypair is shared via a shared hardware component that is accessible by each of the IHSs installed in the chassis.
 7. The method of claim 5, further comprising: validating, by the validation process of the first IHS, an integrity of the inventory of factory installed hardware components of the first IHS included in the first inventory certificate using the first keypair.
 8. The method of claim 7, further comprising validating, by the validation process of the first IHS, an integrity of the inventory of factory installed shared hardware components of the chassis included in the second inventory certificate using the shared second keypair.
 9. A method for validating secure assembly and delivery of a first IHS (Information Handling System) that utilizes hardware components of a shared chassis, the method comprising: during factory-provisioning of the first IHS: generating, by a remote access controller of the first IHS installed in the shared chassis, a first certificate signing request (CSR) that identifies an inventory of factory-installed hardware components of the IHS; transmitting, by the remote access controller of the first IHS, the first CSR to a factory certificate authority; uploading an IHS inventory certificate generated by the factory certificate authority from the first CSR to a secured memory utilized by the remote access controller of the first IHS; and upon delivery of the chassis: retrieving, by a validation process of the first IHS, the IHS inventory certificate uploaded to the first IHS during factory provisioning of the first IHS; retrieving, by the validation process of the first IHS, a chassis inventory certificate uploaded to a shared component of the chassis by a second IHS installed in the shared chassis, wherein the chassis inventory certificate includes an inventory identifying a plurality of shared hardware components of the chassis; collecting, by the validation process of the first IHS, an inventory of detected hardware components of the first IHS and an inventory of detected shared hardware components of the chassis; and comparing, by the validation process of the first IHS, the collected inventories of detected hardware components of the first IHS and of the detected shared hardware components of the chassis against the inventories from the IHS inventory certificate and from the chassis inventory certificate in order to validate the detected hardware components as the same hardware components installed during factory assembly of the first IHS and of the chassis.
 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the shared hardware components comprise storage drives accessible by the first IHS and by the second IHS installed in the shared chassis.
 11. The method of claim 9, wherein the inventory of factory installed hardware components included in the IHS inventory certificate is signed by the factory certificate authority using a private keypair that is generated by the first IHS during the factory provisioning of the first IHS.
 12. The method of claim 9, wherein the inventory of shared hardware components of the chassis included in the chassis inventory certificate is signed by the factory certificate authority using a shared keypair that is generated by the second IHS during the factory provisioning of the second IHS.
 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the shared keypair is shared by the first IHS and by the second IHS installed in the shared chassis.
 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the shared keypair is stored by a shared hardware component that is accessible by the first IHS and by the second IHS installed in the shared chassis.
 15. The method of claim 11, further comprising: validating an integrity of the signed inventory of factory installed hardware components included in the IHS inventory certificate using the private keypair; wherein the private keypair is further stored in the secured memory utilized by the remote access controller of the first IHS.
 16. The method of claim 12, further comprising: validating an integrity of the signed inventory of shared hardware components of the chassis included in the chassis inventory certificate using the shared keypair; wherein the shared keypair is further stored by the shared hardware components of the chassis.
 17. A first IHS (Information Handling System) of a plurality of IHSs installed in a shared chassis, the first IHS comprising: one or more processors; and one or more memory devices coupled to the processors, the memory devices storing computer-readable instructions that, upon execution by the processors, cause a factory provisioning process to: generate a first certificate signing request (CSR) that identifies an inventory of factory-installed hardware components of the first IHS; generate a second CSR that identifies components of the chassis that are shared by the plurality of IHSs installed in the chassis; transmit the first CSR and the second CSR to a factory certificate authority; upload a first inventory certificate generated by the factory certificate authority from the first CSR to a secured memory utilized by the first IHS and a second inventory certificate generated by the factory certificate authority from the second CSR to a shared component of the chassis; and, upon delivery of the first IHS, further cause a validation process to: retrieve the first inventory certificate uploaded to the first IHS during factory provisioning of the first IHS and the second inventory certificate uploaded to the shared component of the chassis; collect an inventory of detected hardware components of the first IHS and an inventory of detected shared hardware components of the chassis; and compare the detected hardware components of the first IHS against the factory installed hardware components specified in the first inventory certificate in order to validate the detected hardware components as the same hardware components installed during factory assembly of the first IHS; and compare the detected shared hardware components of the chassis against the second inventory certificate in order to validate the detected shared hardware components of the chassis as the same shared components of the chassis installed during factory assembly of the chassis.
 18. The IHS of claim 17, wherein the shared hardware components of the chassis comprise storage drives accessible by the first IHS and by additional IHSs installed in the shared chassis.
 19. The IHS of claim 17, wherein the inventory of factory installed hardware components included in the first inventory certificate is signed by the factory certificate authority using a private keypair that is generated by the first IHS during the factory provisioning of the first IHS.
 20. The IHS of claim 19, wherein the inventory of shared hardware components of the chassis included in the second inventory certificate is signed by the factory certificate authority using a shared keypair that is generated by the first IHS during the factory provisioning of the first IHS. 